Jump to content

Talk:Development of Chinese Nationalist air force (1937–1945)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

First metal monoplane dogfight

[edit]

"These engaged Japanese fighters in many major air battles beginning on14 August 1937, when Imperial Japanese Navy warplanes raided Chienchiao airbase; "814" has thus become known as "Air Force Day". Chinese Boeing P-26/281 fighters engaged Japanese Mitsubishi A5M fighters in the world's first dogfight between all-metal monoplane fighters" I was under the impression that the first dogfight between all metal monoplanes took place in Spain in June 1937, when multiple Republican I-16 pilots claimed the first Bf 109s to be downed. (Cf. Frank Glasgow Tinker, http://surfcity.kund.dalnet.se/yugoslavia_petrovich.htm)

Alázhlis (talk) 18:33, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

[edit]

The individual that aquired the P40's for China from the Uited States was Cecil Folmar. He was in China at that time & went to Hawaii on behalf of the Natinalist Chinese. Claire Chennault directed him to make the purchase these aircraft. I was told this by Cecil Folmar, Jr., MD, his son, who is my otologist.

My name is Vern P. Martin. I currently live at 16985 Kawai Court Fountain Valley, CA 92708. I was a member of the 14th Army Air Force. I was a radar mechanic with the 373 & 374 Heavy Bomb Squadrons of the 308th Heavy Bomb Group. My tour of duty was from July 1943 to July 1945.

It was my understanding that the the P40's & P51's were painted to resemble the tiger shark which was feared by the Japanese. How it was transferred to the Bengal Tiger, I don't know.

POV problems

[edit]

Some visible editorialising. -- Миборовский U|T|C|M|E|Chugoku Banzai! 06:43, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Explain. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.11.104.9 (talk) 05:57, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Split off portion

[edit]

Split off Development of Chinese armoured forces (1927-1945) from this page. -- Миборовский U|T|C|M|E|Chugoku Banzai! 23:06, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup

[edit]

I've begun a major cleanup of this article, if you could refrain from making any edits for the next 2 hours or so it would br greatly appreceated. I'll remove the tag when I'm done. -Loren 18:58, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've broken up this article to limit it to discussion on development of the ROCAF. Information on engagements have been moved to Aerial Engagements of the Second Sino-Japanese War, while relevant info on the Burma supply route will be incorporated into the existing article The Hump. -Loren 23:16, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Some of the content of this article reads like it was copied directly out of a book, probably of Russian origin based upon the language. If so this could cause major copyright questions. Many of the contributions of the anon who created this article seem suspect. -Loren 20:05, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Title

[edit]

Shouldn't the title of this article be Development of the Chinese Nationalist air force (1937-1945)? I feel a the is called for. Manxruler 10:46, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting consensus discussion on addition of image of American pilots

[edit]

thumb|300px|left|The Flying Tigers Young American pilots fighting the Japaneses in China

Discussion welcome.Arilang1234 (talk) 06:13, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting consensus discussion on addition of image of Kuomingdang flags

[edit]
The Flag of the Republic of China


Discussion welcomeArilang1234 (talk) 06:15, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I shall go on with the addition of flag.








"Blue Sky with a White Sun", the party emblem of the Kuomintang

Requesting consensus on addition of army flag

[edit]
Flag of the National Revolutionary Army.

Discussion welcomeArilang1234 (talk) 06:26, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Development of Chinese Nationalist air force (1937–45). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:41, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]