Talk:Devdas (2002 Hindi film)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 12:04, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 12:04, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Infobox and lead
[edit]- The poster's non-free use rationale looks good.
- Couldn't find any issues with the infobox.
- Add a comma after Aishwarya Rai Bachchan.
- Add a comma after Smita Jaykar.
- "read it for" → "reading it for"
- Remove the comma after "second time".
- Remove the comma after "May 2001".
- "did an extensive" → "did extensive"
- Add a comma after "Film City".
- "Indian film of the year" → "Indian films of the year"
- Add a comma after "Best Actress (Rai Bachchan)".
Plot and cast
[edit]- Plot is 629 words, so that passes WP:FILMPLOT.
- Couldn't find any issues with the cast section.
Production
[edit]Development
[edit]- In the caption, change "read" to "reading".
- "explained of how" → "explained how"
- Try reducing the amounts of quotes in that first paragraph.
- "to made a film" → "to make a film"
- "love to the film" → "love for the film"
- "found resemblance" → "found a resemblance"
- "read it entirely for the first" → "read it entirely for the first time"
- "he is shown finish" → "he is shown finishing"
Casting
[edit]- Add a comma after Aishwarya Rai Bachchan.
- "appear" → "appeared"
- "specially" → "specifically"
- "third films" → "third film"
- "romantics" → "romantic films"
- Is there a word missing between "former features as Devdas".
- Add a comma after "Smita Jaykar".
- The sentence starting with "After Kher was cast" needs to be reworded (it's a bit confusing).
- Add a comma after Manoj Bajpayee.
Sets
[edit]- "film sets" → "film is set"
- "an extensive research" → "extensive research"
- "different set design" → "different set designs"
- Add a comma after "Devdas' house".
- "twenty five" → "twenty-five"
Characters
[edit]- Add a comma after Reza Shariffi.
- "the crews watch" → "the crews watched"
- "was western look" → "was a western look"
- Add a comma after "handkerchief".
- Add a comma after "white".
- Add a comma after "dhoti".
- "decided to do not watch" → "decided to not watch"
- Add a comma after "chudipards".
- Add a comma after "brocades".
Filming
[edit]- "latter done the research" → "latter did research"
- Add a comma after Vaibhavi Merchant.
- "burnt for three" → "burnt three"
- "two crews had" → "two crew members had"
- "one died" → "one dying"
- "was seriously" → "being seriously"
- "trying help" → "trying to help"
- Change both uses of "was shot" to "were shot".
- I don't think "audiography" is a word.
- Yes, it is. I have linked the word to its Wikipedia article. --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 01:17, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
Music
[edit]- Make this section a subsection under production per WP:FILMMUSIC.
- "had gave" → "had given"
- Other than that, this section looks good.
Release and reception
[edit]Marketing and release
[edit]- Remove both uses of "finally".
- "filmed for several" → "filmed several"
- "a auditorium" → "an auditorium"
- "faced several postponement" → "facing several postponements"
- "on July 2002" → "in July 2002"
- "versions was released" → "versions were released"
Critical response
[edit]- Add a comma after "story, sets".
- "was brilliantly directed" → "had brilliantly directed"
- "express" → "expressed"
Box office
[edit]- Add a comma after "narrative style".
- "on the next week" → "in the next week"
Awards and nominations
[edit]- "to ask their helps" → "to ask for their help"
- Remove the comma after "48th Filmfare Awards".
Legacy
[edit]- "several listing" → "several listings"
- "of properties" → "of the properties"
- "auction website" → "auction websites"
- "Talked to" → "Talking to"
- "On late March 2003" → "In late March 2003"
- "re-exhibited by on August" → "re-exhibited in August"
- "works has been" → "works have been" or "work has been"
References
[edit]- Archive all archivable sources (either manually or with this tool).
Progress
[edit]GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
· · · |
Comments
[edit]- @Nicholas Michael Halim: Great work on improving the article to GA-status. For future reference, I suggest you send/submit your articles to the Guild of Copy Editors. They are a group who basically fix typos and any errors for you, and it can make it easier for GA-reviewers like me, so I won't have to add multiple suggestions about typos. Once again, great work, I'm passing the article for GA, just keep that group in mind before nominating. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 13:14, 25 March 2021 (UTC)