Talk:DevOps toolchain

This article was nominated for deletion on 25 March 2016. The result of the discussion was keep.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

This page should not be speedy deleted because...

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (extremely notable and meets Wikipedia:Notability; referenced repeatedly on other pages, pages needed for depth, clarity, and clearly is not vandalism ) --Kharnagy (talk) 19:10, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Question to toolchain phases [SOLVED]

Why are phases defined here as PLAN, CREATE, VERIFY, PACKAGE, RELEASE, CONFIGURE, MONITOR and not PLAN, CODE, BUILD, TEST, RELEASE, DEPLOY, OPERATE, MONITOR? (as referenced here: http://passionateaboutoss.com/what-does-devops-mean-to-oss/) Or, maybe both views can be compared/integrated? Or are these different approaches? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skyroad (talk • contribs) 06:48, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting reference to one-man blog entry (itself citing "an unknown source" for that alternate phraseology) per Verifiability content policy. See WP:SELFPUBLISH. -- Paulscrawl (talk) 20:15, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why not use a table format?

Why not present DevOps phases as a table with references to product family pages and comparisons? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.26.72.143 (talk) 04:54, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge back w/ main DevOps article

This is a confusing nebulous article that combines these two concepts of a ToolChain with Stages of development or a life cycle. Probably doesn't merit it's own page, mainly just a regurgitation of the Gartner report which talked about tools used during the various stages. I think merging some of this page back into the main article would make that article more interesting. Catjgb (talk) 05:48, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]