Talk:Detour (The X-Files)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Hahc21 (talk · contribs) 03:47, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Review

Ok, no dablinks, references are very good. I went through the article and fixed all that i spotted, which were pure minor edtis, so that it was unnecessary to wait until the nominator did them. As everything has been addressed, and the article was in good shape, i'm passing it. —Hahc21 03:13, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Verdict

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

—Hahc21 03:13, 23 June 2012 (UTC)