Talk:Destination: Imagination/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Theleftorium 16:29, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

I've done some edits to the article and it looks good (although I think the plot section is a bit too big and the reception section is a bit too small). The only thing that keeps me from passing the article is the infobox image. The fair-use rationale is really weak and I'm not sure it meets the non-free content criteria. Theleftorium 16:20, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

I strengthened the rationale, it should be good now. The Flash ^{talk} 19:51, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   A bit small but comprehensive enough for GA.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Congrats! Theleftorium 20:11, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the review! :) The Flash ^{talk} 20:24, 10 November 2009 (UTC)