Talk:Design B-65 cruiser/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- Left several notes inline with the <!-- --> feature; could you please check those out? NW (Talk) 03:04, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
- I saw your copyedits within the article, and they seem fine.
- Left several notes inline with the <!-- --> feature; could you please check those out? NW (Talk) 03:04, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- If I am correct, File:Design B-65.jpg is replacable with a free image, but precedent would have us tag it with {{Rk}} instead? NW (Talk) 03:08, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
- No; as the ships were never built, any drawing made by someone intending to release it under a free license would be creating a derivative work of line drawings etc. in books. See the lead image in Design 1047 battlecruiser for a similar situation. —Ed (Talk • Contribs) 06:16, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
- The image was just deleted under the F7 criteria; could you go check that out? NW (Talk) 15:14, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
- Have asked, am very confused as to why it was deleted... —Ed (Talk • Contribs) 21:40, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
- The new image seems appropriate. NW (Talk) 01:11, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
- Have asked, am very confused as to why it was deleted... —Ed (Talk • Contribs) 21:40, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
- The image was just deleted under the F7 criteria; could you go check that out? NW (Talk) 15:14, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
- No; as the ships were never built, any drawing made by someone intending to release it under a free license would be creating a derivative work of line drawings etc. in books. See the lead image in Design 1047 battlecruiser for a similar situation. —Ed (Talk • Contribs) 06:16, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
- If I am correct, File:Design B-65.jpg is replacable with a free image, but precedent would have us tag it with {{Rk}} instead? NW (Talk) 03:08, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- NW (Talk) 03:03, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
- Passed! Good work, Ed. NW (Talk) 01:11, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail: