Talk:Descriptive phenomenological method in psychology
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Praise
[edit]Notability was questioned on this article. Just a note to say that as a teacher of qualitative research in psychology I was very glad to find this page existed; the Giorgi method used to be very widely taught - one of the few systematic qual approaches in psychology (esp American) until qual work became more widely accepted in the 1990s or so. While this particular method is perhaps not used as widely now as it used to be, it's got an important place in the history of qual research in psych, and is notable also for being properly rooted in phenomenological theory, moreso perhaps than more contemporary phenomenological approaches such as Smith's I.P.A. etc. Alasdairgf (talk) 17:24, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Descriptive phenomenological method in psychology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131203141411/http://www.ipjp.org/index.php/editorialboard/29-amedeo-giorgi to http://www.ipjp.org/index.php/editorialboard/29-amedeo-giorgi
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:37, 9 September 2017 (UTC)