Talk:Des Moines speech/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Hydrangeans (talk · contribs) 08:16, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Generalissima (talk · contribs) 22:40, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll give this one a go-through! LEvalyn has volunteered to help out with the source review. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 22:40, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Source review

I like to use a random number generator to pick 10 sources or 10% (whichever is greater) to check. For this article, I'll look at sources 1, 6, 8, 21, 25, 28, 34, 44, 46, and 50 as they are numbered in this diff. Looking forward to it! ~ L 🌸 (talk) 02:36, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1. Goodman (2008, p. 351). Checks out. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 02:36, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

6. Dunn (2013, p. 50). Checks out. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 02:36, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

8. Dunn (2013, pp. 54–55). Checks out. A real yikes on this guy's diary for sure. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 02:36, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

21. Cole (1974, p. 160); Berg (1998, p. 425). Cole checks out. I wasn't able to easily access Berg, but all the info in this sentence is verified by Cole. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 02:36, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

25. Dunn (2013, p. 300). At least in my copy, this quote actually appears on p. 302 of Dunn, not p. 300. Since my page numbers matched for the earlier citations to Dunn that I've checked, I'd advise amending the citation here. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 02:36, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well spotted! The copy I can access also indicates it's 302. That's my bad. Should be fixed now. And many thanks, to you and Generalissima, for taking up the review! Hydrangeans (she/her | talk | edits) 05:49, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]