Talk:Des Moines metropolitan area
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Sources
[edit]This article does not cite several sources, including the 2005 population esitmate, which seems to be inaccurate as several areas within Des Moines is falling in population. Ajwebb 00:36, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
- I fixed the article and added references. --Iowahwyman 05:06, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Des Moines metropolitan area. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.census.gov/popest/metro/tables/2009/CBSA-EST2009-01.csv - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130911234518/http://factfinder2.census.gov to http://factfinder2.census.gov
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:14, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Lead is a highlight of article
[edit]I copied some text only in the lead to the relevant article sections. The lead is meant to be a highlight of the article, not a unique source of cited data. One confusing ref is the 2012 Factfinder from the Census, used to support 2017 estimate of population. I found a usable ref from Business Insider to replace an illegible ref, about the fast growth rate of the metro area. - - Prairieplant (talk) 22:11, 8 December 2020 (UTC)