Talk:Dermatofibroma

Medicine: Dermatology / Pathology Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Dermatology task force.
	This article is supported by the Pathology task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Dermatofibroma.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

note

contrary to what is written in this article, several sources I have come across have emphasized the fact that dermatofibromas never develop into basal cell carcinoma.

Hahahahahahahahaha.. this is AWESOME!!! I'm doing a report in A&P on this and its not giving me much info. any one wanna help i'd appreciate it.

Dermatofibrosarcoma_protuberans

i've added a bit about difficulty of differentiation from rare malignant fibrohistocytic tumours--Mongreilf (talk) 10:09, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Citations

This article still needs citations. Kilbad (talk) 00:13, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Title

Why is the article title a term that is never used in the rest of the article, instead of "dermatofibroma," which is used throughout the article and in cited sources? I have no experience with medical articles, so I wonder if there is some specific convention that applies here to explain this apparently strange choice for the title. Anecdotally, my dermatologist exclusively used this term, and didn't even say something like, "Even though I use the term dermatofibroma, you should be aware that xxxxxxxxx is the term you'll find elsewhere." Thank you. Holy (talk) 16:24, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed now. Natureium (talk) 17:45, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]