Talk:Depictions of Gautama Buddha in film

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Depictions of Gautama Buddha in film article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Buddhism Low‑importance

	This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film C‑class

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Comments

I've moved the film described here Buddha (2008 film) and its historical section back here. It still looks crude, but the solution should be better than the previous one. --Tikiwont 09:47, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for doing this - it's been on my to-do list, but I've been swamped recently! Hopefully, I'll be able to lend a hand soon. I think a "Buddha in the media" article would be interesting, too. Nightngle 13:46, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed move/rename

Since the (film) usually denotes a specific film, wouldn't it be better to use "Buddha in film"?SkierRMH 06:17, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The current title is only a leftover since the information was originally here and that for a specific film was essentially split off. So it would certainly better to move it, but I was so far mulling over a title while editing. How about "Depictions of Buddha in film"? --Tikiwont 07:56, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Works for me - as there's no overall 'cultural depictions', that seems to be a better description. SkierRMH 01:26, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK. I'll move ot now. --Tikiwont 12:02, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Depictions of Gautama Buddha in film. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080513034245/http://www.imdb.com:80/title/tt0439865/? to http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0439865/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:04, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]