Talk:Department of Alaska

Alaska Top‑importance

	Alaska portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alaska, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Alaska on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AlaskaWikipedia:WikiProject AlaskaTemplate:WikiProject AlaskaAlaska articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Former countries

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles

Military history: North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Untitled

We need sources to prove that Mr. Wlodzimierz Krzyzanowski was indeed the first administrator of Alaska.

The local newspaper investigated these claims once, with surprise, and didn't find anything conclusive. (Anchorage Daily News, Dec 17, 2002, "Poland honors second 'ski' to lead Alaska")

"largely unexplored"

"When the United States had first bought Alaska, vast regions of the area still remained unexplored."

Is this a 'colonial' perspective? What about the indigenous population? --mgaved (talk) 18:28, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]