Talk:Denys Dobson

A fact from Denys Dobson appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 21 August 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that after English rugby international forward Denys Dobson was killed by a charging rhinoceros, he was reportedly said to always have had "a weak hand off"?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2009/August.

Wikipedia

Rugby union Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rugby union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rugby union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rugby unionWikipedia:WikiProject Rugby unionTemplate:WikiProject Rugby unionrugby union articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Ref's name

Personally I'd be more inclined to go by the contemporary reports - there is no requirement for references to be online. However, the references to the newspaper reports aren't realy up to scratch at the moment, we really need article titles and ideally page number. On the subject of online access, I note the SMH archive should be available online formt eh National Library of Australia by the end of the year http://www.nla.gov.au/ndp/selected_newspapers/Future_Titles.html whic should help resolve this. David Underdown (talk) 08:22, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'd agree with going with the contemporary reports, but I've yet to read any of them. Also if the papers in question state the guy's name as Harry, then as a point of contention it can be referenced to nail it down. I look forward to the archiving of the papers from the LoA. FruitMonkey (talk) 17:15, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]