Talk:Denmark at the 1952 Winter Olympics/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 18:19, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
I'll review this one. MWright96 (talk) 18:19, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Background
[edit]- "The National Olympic Committee and Sports Confederation of Denmark was formally recognized" - recognised
- Are you sure on these? The "z" form is used by Americans. Courcelles (talk) 15:30, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
- "Denmark was represented in Oslo by a single figure skater," - try In Oslo, Denmark was represented by a single figure skater,
Figure skating
[edit]- "and had previousily represented" - typo; should be previously
- "At the 1948 Winter Olympics he had" - a comma is needed between "Olympics" and "he"
- "The men's singles here in Oslo were held over 19–21 February 1952." - The Oslo men's singles were held over 19–21 February 1952.
- Consider inserting a wikiilnk of 6.0 system to ordinal placement for those unfamiliar with figure skating.
- "and his lowest ranking was fourteenth four of fourteen skaters" - eliminate "four"
- Maybe add the "scope=col" field to the data table per MOS:DTT?
Good effort so far. Nothing major popped up during my review. MWright96 (talk) 19:26, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
- Everything has been addressed, MWright96. Thanks for the review! Courcelles (talk) 15:33, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Courcelles: Now promoting to GA class. MWright96 (talk) 16:10, 29 November 2018 (UTC)