This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alaska, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Alaska on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AlaskaWikipedia:WikiProject AlaskaTemplate:WikiProject AlaskaAlaska articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cooperatives, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CooperativesWikipedia:WikiProject CooperativesTemplate:WikiProject CooperativesCooperatives articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
I understand how this might seem like it should be merged with Denali Alaskan Federal Credit Union. But because of their different histories and business directions I thought it might be appropriate to write about them as separate entities.
Thank you for noticing and replying. I've been attempting to mark things such as these in the absence of anyone else. The prevailing standard on here appears to be as such: do any of those three articles, standing by themselves, have the potential to expand much beyond what they are now? In the case of the insurance and mortgage subsidiary articles, if there's not much more that can be done with them, it smacks of promotion to have separate articles for them. That's where I've been coming from with any article I've tagged with Template:Merge to.RadioKAOS (talk) 04:21, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I contest this PROD on the basis that it's being pushed by blatant COI editors who for years have "maintained" this article on behalf of the credit union. The history makes that obvious. The notion that this company is a notable topic one day and not notable the next based solely on who its parent company is at any one time is total hogwash. This is NOT the way Wikipedia works. See above merge "discussion", compare it with this and see that the merge proposal may actually have been necessary, even if none of the rest of the community felt like bothering. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 03:02, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]