Talk:Demographics of Texas

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States: Texas Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Top-importance).

Sidebar of Kever Nov. 15 article

http://www.chron.com/mediaManager/?controllerName=image&action=get&id=1758444&width=628&height=471 Says that the states sending the most to Texas are:

CA: 68,959
LA: 31,149
FL: 26,668
OK: 22,969
IL: 20,169

And by year, the state with the most:

CA in 2009, 2008, and 2007 - 61,270, 73,174, and 78,310, respectively
LA in 2006: 118,552
- LA is asteriked because Hurricane Katrina caused a sharp increase in migration from Louisiana to Texas. During that year 81,572 people went from California to Texas

WhisperToMe (talk) 03:53, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Demographics of Texas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:36, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Numbers don't add up

45.3% Non-Hispanic White + 37.6% Hispanic (in body of article) does not even add up to the 84.5% White (table). Something is wrong here. 216.8.143.171 (talk) 15:28, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Racial bias

Can y’all add the distinction from black to African? And also break it down farther into Nigerian, Kenyan, South African, etc. 97.105.223.133 (talk) 04:46, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]