Talk:Demographics of Costa Rica/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions about Demographics of Costa Rica. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Untitled
Costa rica was also sponsared in christopher columbises journy —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.62.100.215 (talk) 20:47, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
Chinese
At the beginning of the page it states that the Chinese population is 1% and then below it lists it as 0%. 70000 Chinese cannot constitute 0%
It seems this has been corrected. It _is_ around 1% Chinese, around 1,5% asian as a whole, I believe. --Crio de la Paz (talk) 22:44, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
Net Migration Rate
I eliminated the following, because it doesn't make sense and does not have any meaning: "Costa Rica is a bipolar country in the aspect of migration. While it receives many people from nearby countries, it also provides people to other countries, mainly the United States." Costa Rica, as other countries, receives migrants and costarricans do migrate too. Costa Rica has a positive net migration rate, and, depending on the period one considers immigration has been one of the highest of the continent. Lots of US citizens live outside the US and lots of europeans and canadians too, heck, europeans have colonized big areas outside of Europe (I am living proof) and the US citizens, europeans and canadians migrate quite a lot - Are these countries "bipolar"? In 2009 Costa Rica was among the top 10 in America. Costa Rica even had, for the period between 2000-2005 a higher net migration rate than the US and than North America, being second in the continent for that period only to Canada. For this I am using data from: http://data.un.org/Data.aspx?d=PopDiv&f=variableID%3A85 https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2112rank.html So, taking out the "prejudice" out of migration and doing some demographic research we find that CR has a positive migration rate that, at times, has been quite high. --Crio de la Paz (talk) 22:41, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
A lot of the info contradicts each other.
I can't read Spanish so I can't look at the census and fix it myself but... lemme give some examples.
At the the beginning of the article it says; together, whites and mestizos make up a 94% of the population, 3% are black people, 1% Amerindians, 1% Chinese, and 1% other., where as on the list in the Ethnic groups section, Mestizo, Castizo and White would add up to only 79.45%... and then in the same section, not the list, but the paragraph, it says; 40% being White, 40% Castizo, and 14% being Mestizo... now this info correlates to the beginning of the article, but not the list, because Whites + Castizo do not = 80%.
So I think someone who reads Spanish should fix this and find the correct data... my hunch is the list is correct, ie: newer info, but I can't confirm this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by B23Rich (talk • contribs) 05:30, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
I agree with B23Rich that a lot of this data was self-contadictory. I just added a reference for the demographic list and updated the content to match the spreadsheet I downloaded from the authoritative source, as well as deleting the next paragraph (the listing was fairly accurate and now matches the spreadsheet, whereas the paragraph I deleted contradicted the census data). rs2 (talk) 20:32, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Propose merger/redirect from European Costa Rican
Single source of somewhat dubious merit in that it does not cite original data source, and that fails verifiability as sole source of a full article. Propose merger and redirect here. FeatherPluma (talk) 03:00, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Demographics of Costa Rica. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761572479_3/Costa_Rica.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151120125018/http://www.inec.go.cr:80/Web/Home/GeneradorPagina.aspx to http://www.inec.go.cr/Web/Home/GeneradorPagina.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:22, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Demographics of Costa Rica. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.inec.go.cr/Web/Home/pagPrincipal.aspx
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120327062704/http://www.inec.go.cr/Web/Home/pagPrincipal.aspx to http://www.inec.go.cr/Web/Home/pagPrincipal.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:00, 8 September 2017 (UTC)