Talk:Democrats (Greenland)

Greenland High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greenland, a WikiProject related to the nation of Greenland. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.GreenlandWikipedia:WikiProject GreenlandTemplate:WikiProject GreenlandGreenland articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Denmark Mid‑importance

	Denmark portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics: Political parties

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as High-importance).

Populism

I see there is a source saying they are "populists", but populism is an integrated part of the political culture in Greenland and the party is significantly less populist in its approach than e.g. Siumut (which is described simply as Social Democratic) or Naleraq, so I don't think it should be part of the intro. Its hardly an unbiased assessment.--Batmacumba (talk) 21:10, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I can see the source is a chapter by the Danish anthropologist (not political scientist) Jens Dahl in a publication by the NGO the International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs. That is not an unbiased source in this context (the descriptions of a Greenlandic centre-right party which back in 2006 when he wrote the text was unambiguously unionist). One can debate whether their self-image as Social Liberals is correct, or they are more mainstream Liberal if using a European yardstick (which is debatable), but they aren't Conservatives and among the least populist parties in Greenland, so neither of these characterizations are appropriate. It's always a problem sourcing info on Greenlandic politics, but we should avoid biased sources anyway.--Batmacumba (talk) 11:52, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]