Jump to content

Talk:Democratic Society Party

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Intro

[edit]

Please do not add the social-democratic non-sense again. I worked the intro, with solid sources, to make it clear that this is the political wing of the PKK (popular support among some provinces doesn't exclude such a connection) and made clear that this party is nationalist, not merely "pro-Kurdish", an expression which, by the way, doesn't mean jack s*** in the English language. Can someone using the common rules of English language expression explain what "pro-Kurdish" means?? Kurdish nationalist? If not, what then? Just a party who likes the Kurds too much like an automobile club organizing weekend gatherings for collectioneers of Chevrolet 1956s? Damn, if I ever tried to modify MHP's article by modifying "nationalist" to "pro-Turkish", the insults would start flying all over the place. But when it is the political wing of a terrorist organization responsible for kidnappings, extortions, bombings, the biggest supplier of heroine to Europe as well as huge human-trafficking rings, they just become "pro-X". Damn, in which planet am I living in??

Anyways, most of the points in the intro are easily verifiable by most of the sources out there on the net, including the DTP-PKK connection. So if someone is not happy because s/he claims the sources are too "weak', just contact me instead of reverting/deleting and I can dig up sources by the kilo in a fairly short amount of time. Cheers! Baristarim 10:03, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please, take some of that heat and focus it into the article. "Pro-Kurdish" must mean something, and that should go into the article. For example the top search hit [1] makes some statements about past governments seeking to "destroy Kurdishness", "policies that border on genocide", the recent repeal of a prohibition on the Kurdish language, extrajudicial executions, village guards, state of emergency, extrajudicial executions, and the closing of the Human Rights Foundation of Turkey in the Kurdish region. The position of opponents, for instance, the nature of their fears regarding threats to the "indivisible unity of the Turkish state" also needs to be explained. Now most half decent Wikipedia articles manage to provide more information than a random Web search, by a large factor, and so this article should aspire to go through all those things and more, and find which are current issues and which the current party is involved in and who is with them and who is against them. This article contains only about 0.1% of the information about the issues that it should. Wnt (talk) 18:24, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal

[edit]

The article has a separate section that deals specifically with any PKK connections. Why not move all the relevant stuff there? --Michalis Famelis (talk) 03:49, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The intro should summarize what shall be developed in the article, right? It is not just a small introductory note. The PKK connection (allegations) are widespread and very serious to be simply overlooked in the intro and relegated to a sub-section.
I see what you mean, however this PKK connection, in fact, forms the "raison d'etre" of the DTP. Many DTP members regularly praise Ocalan, claim emotional connections to the PKK and also claim the same "political base" as the PKK. All of what I mentioned is very well-documented, there is no doubt about it. Please see the latest source I added about the conference last week organized by the DTP and supervised by Zana, which called Ocalan the leader of the Kurdish people and called for his release. Zana also regularly praises Ocalan and calles him "the leader" (Serok in Kurdish, in German it is something close to the fuhrer). The sources are there.
So, I think the approach should be inversed: the PKK connection forms the fundamental point of focus for any description of the DTP, not just a small note. For example Sebahat Tuncel, a DTP MP, was in jail for alleged PKK connections in its armed wing when she was elected. Not just an idealogue. I know that there are many people who sympathize with Kurds and all, but this DTP doesn't represent the Kurdish people. This is not just about the AKP either, there is an all-Kurdish party called HAK-PAR which firmly condemns the PKK and calls it terrorist. That's all I am saying. Baristarim 04:03, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I get your point. However, you must admit that there is a good chance that it is Point-of-View-ish. After all we are talking about a party that has not been pronounced illegal by the Turkish state (which could be interpreted as insufficient evidence to link it operationally with the PKK), has legally elected local officials within Turkey, and is accepted by the S.I. as an observer party (Batasuna, a similarly controversial party is not accepted anywhere). I think that all this makes the PKK connection story a matter of Point-of-View. I do understand the POV and I'm not criticizing it here, but this is Wikipedia, eh? --Michalis Famelis (talk) 18:30, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You are right that I might have a bias - I wouldn't disagree. However, it is not purely a question of pov since the DTP-PKK connection accusations were definitely not invented by me. However, I hear your point and I promise to work more on the article, especially the intro, to clean it up more and add DTP's point of views and declarations, so that the intro reads really as if it was written by a completely uninformed thirdy-party as far as pov issues are concerned. Hopefully I will have the time to do it later tonight. If I don't, feel free to nag me about it :) Nevertheless, I do feel that at least the fact that such a controversy exists should be in the intro. But I agree that it's links with PES or SI should also be mentioned in the intro with the fact that it tries to present itself as social-democratic.
But, just between you and me, the fact that DTP claims leftist ideals, albeit "softer" ones like social democracy, points to the fact that there has to be some sort of a link with the PKK. I base this on the fact that an overwhelming majority of the Kurds are very pious Muslims. And Turks of Kurdish origin form the majority of the "cadres" of Islamist-based militant groups (see 2003 bombings in Istanbul, Turkish Hizbollah or IBDA-C). I am definitely not banging up on the Kurds by saying that, it is just a statement of fact. You and I also do know that many prominent statesmen, businessmen and artists in Turkey were/are ethnic Kurds. But the fact still remains that Kurds are pious in general. As such, a truly Kurdish party independant of the PKK (a self-proclaimed Maoist organization with Stalinst leanings) would have to be more religious based, like the AKP (this is the primary reason why DTP still has so much difficulty making in-roads with many Kurds and still stagnates around 4-5 percent of the vote). Many DTP MPs are (obviously) atheist to begin with! You see what I mean? As one of the sources says: "It is an open secret that DTP is linked to the PKK" :) Baristarim 04:49, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Accusations section

[edit]

"Senior DTP leaders maintain that they support a unified Turkey within a democratic framework. Tuğluk published an article in Radikal in May 2007 to prove that claim.[28]"

This is not relevant to the section title. It all depends what they mean by "unified" and "democratic" (federation etc can fall into this description). However this is still irrelevant to the section title: It is not about their policies or ideologies, but their connections with the PKK. That sentence talks about their policies. I actually read that article in Radikal the day it came out, and there is absolutely no mention of the PKK in it. I think that that sentence should be moved to another section talking about the ideology of the party. Baristarim 04:14, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Turkey Takes Steps to Ban Kurdish Party

[edit]

Turkish prosecutors have reportedly moved to ban a pro-Kurdish political party in Turkey that has been accused of colluding with Kurdish rebels.[2]---- Mr Blu3 (talk) 16:59, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Democratic Society Party, as of this day, is no more; the Constitutional Court unanimously decided to disband the party because "along with the actions, in recognition of the connections with the terrorist organization (PKK), (DTP) has become a center that contradictory acts against the unitarian coutry and public." [3] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.251.11.179 (talk) 18:01, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why has the infobox been removed?

[edit]

There is a mechanism for dealing with defunct parties: you can enter a date into the "dissolved" field of the full box. Removing the infobox severely reduces the readability and informative nature of the article, and therefore I am restoring it. Lockesdonkey (talk) 17:52, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Was"

[edit]

Isn't it a bit early to move everything into the past tense ("Democratic Society Party was a Kurdish political party in Turkey")? It's been banned, declared illegal, but that doesn't mean it instantly ceased to exist, right? --MQDuck (talk) 01:20, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Democratic Society Party. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:28, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Democratic Society Party. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:20, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Democratic Society Party. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:14, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on Democratic Society Party. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:44, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Democratic_Society_Party&oldid=1206930514"