Talk:DemoLinux

Notability

I've taken a look at the state of sourcing in the article and found an additional source while researching. I am fairly certain the additional source allows the article's subject to meet GNG:

Source assessment table:

Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
Clubic		Cited in 82 articles	? The amount of coverage seems to be near the borderline. I think it's enough, but I'm not entirely sure.	? Unknown
[1]	I don't think any of the publisher's commerical partners are affiliated	Cited in 28 articles		✔ Yes
LinuxJournal		LinuxJornal is cited in 593 articles. I had a concern that given the first-person pronouns, the source might be a WP:NEWSBLOG or similar, but no indication exists of such.		✔ Yes
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

With that in mind, I will remove {{Notability}} from the article. ~UN6892 ^t_c 18:28, 15 July 2023 (UTC)