Talk:Demetre Park

United States: South Carolina Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	South Carolina portal This article is supported by WikiProject South Carolina (assessed as Low-importance).

Flowery

Hi. An anon editor continues to re-add content which is contrary to WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV and WP:WEASEL. Specifically, the persistent reintroduction of subjective and opinion-based adjectives (like "prominent", "substantial", "panoramic views", "widely regarded", "spectacular views", etc) are typically to be avoided. Except, in limited cases, where these terms represent a specific opinion or quote or similar - which can be referenced and attributed clearly to a specific person. Otherwise they do not belong. Especially when these terms do not appear (at all) in the single reference used in the related section. As per WP:BRD and WP:CHALLENGE, the burden lies with the editor seeking to add new text, to provide reliable references to support that text. Including references to attribute a subjective opinion. Like something being "spectacular". Or "widely regarded" as such. Continually readding this content (without recourse to discussion and consensus) will not be successful in the long term. Thanks. Guliolopez (talk) 22:46, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If the warring and uncited NPOV pushing continues, next step will be page protection. Thanks. Guliolopez (talk) 19:26, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This advisory still stands. Policy hasn't changed since the first note above. Content should reflect sources. Not a subjective interpretation of them. Guliolopez (talk) 13:17, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]