Talk:Delta Cafe/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Gerald Waldo Luis (talk · contribs) 13:07, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Back here, Another Believer. Will be reviewing this article. GeraldWL 13:07, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Gerald Waldo Luis, Thanks! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 14:38, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Prose and references

[haha, spotted]

• "They sold Delta in 2007 to open another--" so it is closed? Or changed owners? The infobox basically tells that it's still alive. Needs clarification here. GeraldWL 13:12, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

  Gerald Waldo Luis, Ownership change -- the restaurant continues to operate today. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 14:39, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

  Another Believer, "They sold" will give the impression that they sold the Delta Cafe property. Perhaps it should be "In 2007, they opened another restaurant called Miss Delta, changing Delta Cafe's owners." GeraldWL 15:42, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

  Gerald Waldo Luis, To me, selling a business does not mean the business stops operating. Ownership changed. The source says "sold". ---Another Believer _(Talk) 21:03, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

  Another Believer, "sold" sounds like you removed your ownership rights of that thing and gave it-- wait.

  You won. GeraldWL 08:49, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

• "and soul food" is backed by two citations. Perhaps only one would suffice.
  • Actually, one was for "Southern", so I moved the citation over a bit. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 14:41, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
• Who even drinks Bloody Marries?
  • Not me! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 14:41, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
• "single dinging space." What does that mean? GeraldWL 13:25, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

  Gerald Waldo Luis, Oops! Dining. Fixed typo. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 14:41, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

• One final: "serving "generous" portions to Reed College students." What portions? Food? GeraldWL 15:10, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

  Gerald Waldo Luis, Yes, that's implied as the article is about a restaurant. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 15:25, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Sources

All good. GeraldWL 13:26, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Like ---Another Believer _(Talk) 14:41, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Images

All images are relevant and have appropriate captions and under free license. The restaurant signage image seemed vague as the sign has been seen at the infobox image; I think that can be replaced by other stuff. GeraldWL 08:56, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Gerald Waldo Luis, I have plans to photograph of the restaurant's exterior, which should show the mural. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 14:50, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Gonna be quick here *takes breath*

Neutral yes, stable yes, broad yes, focus yes. GeraldWL 08:56, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Like ---Another Believer _(Talk) 14:56, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Manual of Style

• Alternative text, maybe? I mean I can do it; the image is just too complicated. Idk; I'll see if I can. GeraldWL 08:56, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

  Gerald Waldo Luis, I've added alt text to all images. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 14:57, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

  Like GeraldWL 15:03, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

My extensive conclusion of the article and whether it would pass the GA criteria and how it could--

 Passed (this is not a flight review, it's not that long)

Still not taking place; see prose section. GeraldWL 15:10, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.