Talk:Delicious Library

Apple Inc. Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apple Inc., a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Apple, Mac, iOS and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Apple Inc.Wikipedia:WikiProject Apple Inc.Template:WikiProject Apple Inc.Apple Inc. articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing: Software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled

Is it just me or does this entry read like marketing copy, not an encyclopedia article. Byset 07:20, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, I was thinking the same thought. This article is not encyclopedic. Geira 14:15, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well I made an edit right now (my first one actually) and added some more stuff. It looks better now, but it still needs work. hope i'm going to sign this comment right ^^ (Me-pawel 02:15, 24 October 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Could someone take that {{{caption}}} thing off? I tried to do it but I don't know how to. Thanks. ;) (Me-pawel 03:08, 25 October 2006 (UTC)) Okay, already fixed it myself (Me-pawel 06:39, 25 October 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Sorry about my earlier post. I really shouldn't drink and post at the same time. My apologies to Mr Shipley for any offense.

competitor

Can we maybe get rid of the reference to some random competitor? I mean, there are dozens of competitors, it looks as though Digital Hoard is just trying to ride on our coat-tails. WilliamJonShipley 23:57, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Had removed the external links before, but missed the inline reference. I do not see how this relates to an article on this software, particularly without sources. ∴ here…♠ 07:06, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As an aside, betacommand had nothing to do with the original edit. It was the same anon who later added external links to this and other articles, ( diff ). ∴ here…♠ 07:11, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delicious Library 2

Its out, i updated the page. Im sorry for the huge image cant figure out how to fix it. Can a mod or someone please fix image smaller or revert. Out to catch those vandals (talk) 07:34, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Delicious Library. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130429014759/http://www.wired.com/gadgets/mac/news/2005/01/66276 to http://www.wired.com/gadgets/mac/news/2005/01/66276

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:00, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]