Jump to content

Talk:Delaware Route 42

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleDelaware Route 42 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 28, 2012Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Delaware Route 42/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Awardgive (talk · contribs) 05:06, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    The sentence "From the western terminus, DE 42 heads southeast on two-lane undivided Blackiston Road, passing through agricultural areas with some woods and homes" needs rewording.
    Split sentence. Dough4872 05:15, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    The phrase "the two routes head east for a concurrency through more rural areas" could use minor rewording.
    Reworded. Dough4872 05:15, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    The milepost for the intersection with DE 15 north needs to be added.
    The DelDOT log does not have a milepost for this intersection. Dough4872 05:15, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    I'm not sure about this, but the section of the route description that describes Maryland Route 330 does not seem relevant.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

This article is very well written with just a few minor issues, so I will put the article on hold for changes to be made. - Awardgive, the editor with the msitaken name. 05:06, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review, I replied to the above comments. Dough4872 05:15, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Since it appears that all possible changes have been made, I am ready to pass the article. - Awardgive, the editor with the msitaken name. 05:28, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]