Talk:Delaware Route 36/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Aviyal (talk · contribs) 21:13, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Review

Failed "good article" nomination

This article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of February 25, 2012, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?:

2. Factually accurate?:

3. Broad in coverage?:

4. Neutral point of view?:

5. Article stability?:

6. Images?:

Doesn't feel like it blends with the criteria. Try and this article better e.g. History needs more information, better reference needed

When these issues are addressed, the article can be renominated. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it have it reassessed. Thank you for your work so far.— /\ talk← Aviyal →Policy) /\ 21:13, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore

The article is very close to a GA qualification but it still need to be more accurate to the point of the article. The article covers almost all of it's topics but I believe that it can be better written with the help of a specialist. Also, the article contail a dead link to Scotts Corner, you can say that it isn't dependent to the article but still it refers about Delaware Route 36. /\ talk← Aviyal →Policy) /\ 21:36, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

He is a specialist in writing about such roads.♦ Dr. Blofeld 22:13, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]