Talk:Delaware Route 11/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MathewTownsend (talk · contribs) 10:39, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

• I've read this article and will review it shortly. It is well written. MathewTownsend (talk) 10:39, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

review

Basically the article is fine but some of the prose could be clarified.

• "DE 11 was created by 1936 on a road taken over by the state by 1931." - can this be clearer?

• Reworded. Dough4872 22:29, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

• "DE 11 begins at the Maryland border in western Kent County, where MD 302 continues to the west towards Templeville, Maryland" - so here the road split? MD 302 goes west, and DE 11 heads northeast?

• The road that carries DE 11 crosses the border into Maryland and the route becomes MD 302. Clarified. Dough4872 22:29, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

• "In the center of Hartly, the route crosses DE 44. After DE 44, the road heads north before curving northeast and leaving Hartly." - something like "In the center of Hartly, the route crosses DE 44, then heads north before it curves northeast and leaves Hartly."?

• Reworded. Dough4872 22:29, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

• "and passing a few homes." - passes a few homes

• Reworded. Dough4872 22:29, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

• "before coming to " - it comes to an end

• Changed. Dough4872 22:29, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

• In the "History" section: "by 1920", "by 1931", "by 1936" - its a little clumsy - perhaps there's no other way to phrase this.

• That's the best way to phrase it as the changes happened by those dates. Dough4872 22:29, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

These are suggestions to improve the prose. I made an edit.[1]

MathewTownsend (talk) 22:20, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the review, I have replied to the above comments. Dough4872 22:29, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

reply

• Great! I just made one more little edit for the sake of prose.[2]

GA review-see WP:WIAGA for criteria (and here for what they are not)

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose: clear and concise, respects copyright laws, correct spelling and grammar:

   B. Complies with MoS for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Provides references to all sources:

   B. Provides in-line citations from reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Main aspects are addressed:

   B. Remains focused:

4. Does it follow the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   Pass!

• Congratulations! MathewTownsend (talk) 23:00, 3 July 2012 (UTC)