Talk:Delaware Route 1/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tinton5 (talk · contribs) 20:42, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Review

1. Well-written:

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (prose)	Prose used throughout/Grammar, spelling, punctuation	✓ Pass
(b) (MoS)	MoS used throughout	✓ Pass

2. Verifiable with no original research:

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (references)	References are factual and accurate	✓ Pass
(b) (citations to reliable sources)	Reliable sources are used throughout	✓ Pass
(c) (original research)	No original research	✓ Pass

3. Broad in its coverage:

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (major aspects)	Covers entirely all vital areas of the article	✓ Pass
(b) (focused)	Clearly written and to the point	✓ Pass

4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.

Notes	Result
Article passes here as well	✓ Pass

5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.

Notes	Result
No edit wars.	✓ Pass

6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales)	Many, many relevant images, fair use as well	✓ Pass
(b) (appropriate use with suitable captions)	Images and captions are relevant and appropriate	✓ Pass

Result

Result	Notes
✓ Pass	Very well written article, which meets GA criteria

Final comments

This article meets GA criteria. Tinton5 (talk) 04:32, 4 December 2014 (UTC)