Talk:Deir el-Medina

Ancient Egypt: Egyptian religion Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egyptological subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient EgyptTemplate:WikiProject Ancient EgyptAncient Egypt articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by Egyptian religion work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

WikiProject Ancient Egypt to-do list:

Needed articles.

We should have an article on every pyramid and every nome in Ancient Egypt. I'm sure the rest of us can think of other articles we should have.

Cleanup.

To start with, most of the general history articles badly need attention. And I'm told that at least some of the dynasty articles need work. Any other candidates?

Standardize the Chronology.

A boring task, but the benefit of doing it is that you can set the dates !(e.g., why say Khufu lived 2589-2566? As long as you keep the length of his reign correct, or cite a respected source, you can date it 2590-2567 or 2585-2563)

Stub sorting

Anyone? I consider this probably the most unimportant of tasks on Wikipedia, but if you believe it needs to be done . . .

Data sorting.

This is a project I'd like to take on some day, & could be applied to more of Wikipedia than just Ancient Egypt. Take one of the standard authorities of history or culture -- Herotodus, the Elder Pliny, the writings of Breasted or Kenneth Kitchen, & see if you can't smoothly merge quotations or information into relevant articles. Probably a good exercise for someone who owns one of those impressive texts, yet can't get access to a research library.

Archaeology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Name Incorrectly Spelt

Deir el-Madinah Incorrect

Deir el-Medina Correct

This potentially proves the article difficult to find and perhaps misleading to someone researching this particular module in Ancient History.

I think it shows the problems of tranliterating Arabic into English. Markh 18:26, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

P4R4D0x 02:25, 10 September 2007 (UTC)P4R4D0x[reply]

Since google book confirms Markh comments (massively) and nobody has objected I have asked an administrator to move the page to the new title -- it involves deleting an existing page redirect that already has the new name. Taam (talk) 11:54, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Discovery?

Who is credited with discovering Deir al-Madinah?

Historical text

I moved the historical text back and made the village life a subsection of that. The reason is that all the subsections are based on historical texts as they were written thousands of years ago. The village section is based partly on arcaelogy evidence so I put this first again. Also I noted that there has been a comment added saying they weren't slaves. This is often repeated and may be tecnicly true but it may also be a matter of semantics. They may have been virtual slaves controlled by cult activity and an unfair justice system. There is something to support this in Romer's book I may check it at a later date and add a little more to clarify this. Good day Zacherystaylor (talk) 16:44, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Americans and British wives

I removed the sentence "more advanced than some of the British and American wives studying them." because I don't find it pertinent or even clear. --Dia^ (talk) 23:52, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Deir el-Medina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060616010805/http://homepage.powerup.com.au/~ancient/dem.htm to http://homepage.powerup.com.au/~ancient/dem.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:50, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is it part of the Theban necropolis?

Is Deir el-Medina part of the Theban necropolis? If so, why not add this information to the article? 173.88.246.138 (talk) 06:38, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: 311_History of Ancient Egypt

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 9 January 2024 and 22 March 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Starkid25 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Lunabean0204, GabrielleGutierrez.

— Assignment last updated by Johnstoncl (talk) 18:15, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]