Talk:Defender (1981 video game)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

   Done some copyedits on the bits that stuck out, so this should be ok.

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

   Absolutely no problems here

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   Fair use rationale on File:Defender red label.flyer.png was a bit rubbish, "Illustrative use in article" isn't really a valid purpose. I've dealt with that

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   A respectable article, well written with only a few minor niggling issues with prose that I've addressed myself. Article passed.

Reviewer: Sabre (talk) 15:33, 23 January 2010 (UTC)