Talk:MOD Chicksands

Military history: Intelligence / British / European

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Intelligence task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

Bedfordshire Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bedfordshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bedfordshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BedfordshireWikipedia:WikiProject BedfordshireTemplate:WikiProject BedfordshireBedfordshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	The infobox box status of this article has been marked as: Complete

Espionage Low‑importance

	MOD Chicksands is within the scope of WikiProject Espionage, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of espionage, intelligence, and related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, or contribute to the discussion.EspionageWikipedia:WikiProject EspionageTemplate:WikiProject EspionageEspionage articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

renaming

Since 1 January 2015, DISC has been JITG (Joint Intelligence Training Group). I propose to rename this article and fix all redirects. Any opposition? The joy of all things (talk) 19:09, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

G'day, I believe that this should be ok, but can you please provide a reference for the name change? It would be good to mention this in the article. Additionally, historic references should remain to DISC if that is what it were called at the time, using a piped link. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 23:16, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

G'day indeed - Yes I do have a ref (which is why it has taken me so long in getting the name changed). Most of the links will just be amendments as the units attached/lodged there are still extant and now belong to JITG. However, I intend to work through every one and make sure it works out (I believe there are only thirty anyway). Best wishes to you (hope it's a nice day in Australia!)

I have mentioned this renaming on the Wikiproject Military History page as there have been no responses until now. The joy of all things (talk) 23:35, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Joint Intelligence Training Group. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://webarchive.loc.gov/all/20061020234808/http%3A//www.sheffordtown.co.uk/around/priory.jpg to http://www.sheffordtown.co.uk/around/priory.jpg

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:30, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Change of article name to MoD Chicksands

Hello, why has the name of this article been changed to Ministry of Defence Chicksands, when all articles within Category:Installations of the Ministry of Defence (United Kingdom) use the MoD prefix? Gavbadger (talk) 18:27, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I agree it should be MoD Chicksands or MOD Chicksands, as in MoD Bicester, MoD Corsham, MoD Donnington, MoD Feltham, MoD Kineton, MoD Shoeburyness and MOD St Athan. I note that the Ministry of Defence styles itself MOD (see Working for MOD). So perhaps the prefix should be MOD (all in capitals) for all of them. Dormskirk (talk) 18:41, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, happy for MOD Chicksands per your reference. Gavbadger (talk) 18:57, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It wouldn't let me change it to MOD Chicksands myself for technical reasons, but I put in a request for rename to MOD Chicksands BritishSpaniard (talk) 09:00, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]