Talk:Defence Intelligence Organisation

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Defence Intelligence Organisation article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Espionage Low‑importance

	Defence Intelligence Organisation is within the scope of WikiProject Espionage, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of espionage, intelligence, and related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, or contribute to the discussion.EspionageWikipedia:WikiProject EspionageTemplate:WikiProject EspionageEspionage articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Defence Intelligence Organisation is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Military history: Intelligence / National / South Pacific

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Intelligence task force
	National militaries task force
	Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force

Note to non-Australian editors

Please note the correct spelling of defence/defense in this context is defence, as this is an article about an Australian organisation and hence follows British, not American, spelling. See here for more information. DirectEdge 23:35, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note to DirectEdge

DirectEdge, after the Herald made inquiries into the Wikiscanner scandal at the Department of Defence, the department said it would ban Defence staff from accessing the encyclopedia. Why are you still editing Wikipedia?

Felize —Preceding unsigned comment added by Felize (talk • contribs) 00:29, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why? Because I don't work for the Department of Defence... DirectEdge 00:33, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]