Talk:Defence Act of 1958 (Sweden)

Sweden Mid‑importance

	Sweden portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: European / Nordic Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	European military history task force
	Nordic military history task force

Purpose

The purpose of this page (which already existed on Swedish wikipedia from which it is translated) is to be able to politically and financially relate articles that deal with what is a consequence of the defense decision.

We are talking about Saab 32 Lansen, Saab 35 Draken, Stridsvagn 103, Sjöormen and by extension Saab 37 Viggen and a number of other Swedish weapons and phenomena such as also sold on the international market. To put them in context.

The decisions of the Riksdag are very thorough in their description of what they want to achieve and what they pay for. They are excellent references for what is related to the decision.

It also means that in other articles you only need to refer to this article and not a forest of references in each article.

--Zzalpha (talk) 17:12, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]