Talk:Deese–Roediger–McDermott paradigm/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Smallman12q (talk · contribs) 00:37, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

While the article is well-sourced, it requires a thorough copyedit to meet GA standards.

Comments

There are only 3 wikilinks in the text...this is insufficient. Please add more wikilinks.
Rather than using "Fabiani et. al (2000) " you should described the study in a sentence..."A study at X university, by X researchers conducted in X year found...X"
The tone is a bit off in places...reading like an essay. For example "The question of why the DRM paradigm still remains. " should be something like "The cause of the DRM paradigm is not fully understood and is the subject of ongoing psychological studies."
Where possible, terms should be defined where they are used...not after as in "The above explanation is known as activation monitoring theory."
There are some grammer errors such as "The wanted to determine the..."...should be "They wanted to determine the..."