Jump to content

Talk:Deep in Love

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleDeep in Love has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 4, 2019Good article nomineeNot listed
June 7, 2019Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Deep in Love. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:11, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Recording date

[edit]

Cartoon network freak "Boxer composed the song in 2011 in Morocco; while she and Morena were driving to a show there by car, he came up with a melody and recorded a demo on his mobile phone." = confirmation of the song being recorded in 2011, as not only does it ref composing but it says he came up with a melody for it and recorded a demo; this shows that's when recording began and it can't have continued after 2011 since that's when the song was released. --Kyle Peake (talk) 16:00, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

GA nomination 2

[edit]

I will get to reviewing this at a later date, but not currently as they are major issues that need at least commenting on from the nominator, if not fixed (reasons should be provided below). These are:

  • Why is 2011 not listed as the recorded year? I have commented on this further above.
  • Can you find a source either stating the genre or breaking down the song enough that it describes "Deep in Love" as fitting a music genre?
  • Any reviews possible to start a critical reception section? If not, you could just add that source I referenced on the GA1 page to the commercial performance section and rename it reception, as it would be describing critical and commercial; see "Morena".

--Kyle Peake (talk) 18:57, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Deep in Love/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Kyle Peake (talk · contribs) 07:45, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'll get to this before Sunday if you have responded to my comments on the talk page before then. Those are the major issues that I can't really start reviewing the article without them being addressed; there are other issues too that I will point out. --Kyle Peake (talk) 07:45, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Infobox and lead

[edit]
  • 2011 should be listed as the recorded year in the infobox as the background and release section clearly sources it as such "composed the song in 2011"
  • "It was later released as a CD single in Italy on 31 October 2011 by Step and Go, while also made available" → "It was released as a CD single in Italy on 31 October 2011 through Step and Go, while later made available"
  • Change target of Radio ZU to Intact Media Group

Background and release

[edit]
  • "Italy on 31 October 2011 by Step and Go" → "Italy on 31 October 2011 via Step and Go"

Music video and promotion

[edit]
  • Good, apart from the same target issue with Radio ZU as the lead

Commercial performance

[edit]
  • "The aforementioned broadcast monitoring service also conducted a year-end chart for 2012, where the track was ranked at number 29." → "Media Forest conducted a year-end radio airplay chart for 2012, where the track ranked at number 29."

Credits and personnel

[edit]
  • Good

Track listings

[edit]
  • Good

Charts

[edit]
  • Good

Certifications

[edit]
  • Good

Release history

[edit]
  • Good

References

[edit]

Final comments and verdict

[edit]
@Kyle Peake: Everything has been addressed. Cartoon network freak (talk) 18:03, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Cartoon network freak: Love it! I'll gladly  Pass this. --Kyle Peake (talk) 18:04, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Kyle Peake: Hi and thank you very much for passing! Is there any possibility you can also get to "On a Sunday", the last one I'm demanding. Greets; Cartoon network freak (talk) 18:05, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Cartoon network freak Will do, do you think you could review "Low Lights" for me actually? --Kyle Peake (talk) 18:23, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]