This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ecuador, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ecuador on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EcuadorWikipedia:WikiProject EcuadorTemplate:WikiProject EcuadorEcuador articles
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article has been created, improved, or expanded by a translator from the Open Knowledge Association. See the OKA task force page of WikiProject Intertranswiki.Intertranswiki/OKAWikipedia:WikiProject Intertranswiki/OKATemplate:WikiProject Intertranswiki/OKAOKA articles
These two articles are about the same topic, or at least so closely overlapping to make two separate articles unnecessary. (t · c) buidhe07:15, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I support this merge proposition and this also makes sense as a place where the pages could be put into one. Jorahm (talk) 17:33, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think the articles need to remain separate. The decriminalization of homosexuality in Ecuador was a long process in which many different strategies were tried out by LGBT organizations, a process of more than a decade. The court case was ultimately the way in which it was achieved, but that was only a small part of the process. Now, I believe that the court case itself is also relevant enough to have its own article, as it was a landmark Supreme Court case with far reaching consequences in legal jurisprudence in the years since. The court case article is small and it needs more content, but that does not mean its not relevant enough by itself. It needs more information about legal arguments in favor and against, the court's ruling criteria, the reception of the ruling, etc. However, as said, they are both relevant topics separately.--Freddy eduardo (talk) 16:28, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
,_logo.png){kind=logo}
