Talk:Declarative knowledge/Archive 2
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Declarative knowledge. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
Requested move 30 March 2023
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 08:19, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
Descriptive knowledge → Declarative knowledge – The terms "descriptive knowledge" and "declarative knowledge" are used as synonyms in the academic literature but the term "declarative knowledge" is much more common, see Google Ngram Viewer Phlsph7 (talk) 07:33, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
Another candidate on par with the term "declarative knowledge" would be "propositional knowledge". It is also commonly used as a synonym in the academic literature and has a similar frequency, see Google Ngram Viewer. Phlsph7 (talk) 16:03, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
- Leaning support, as a well-argued point. BD2412 T 15:33, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Did you know nomination
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Lightburst (talk) 04:17, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
( )
- ... that declarative knowledge is an awareness of facts that differs from practical knowledge in the form of skills and knowledge by acquaintance based on experiential familiarity? Source:
- Bishop, M. J.; Boling, Elizabeth; Elen, Jan; Svihla, Vanessa (21 September 2020). Handbook of Research in Educational Communications and Technology: Learning Design. Springer Nature. p. 74. ISBN 978-3-030-36119-8.
We follow Markauskaite and Goodyear (2017) and Dohn (2017) in distinguishing between three knowledge types. Declarative knowledge is knowledge expressible in propositional statements, often also termed propositional knowledge or know-that (e.g., "President Donald Trump was inaugurated on 20.01.2017," "Karl Marx wrote Capital,' "Force = Mass x Acceleration'). Procedural knowledge is often called practical knowledge, skill, or know-how (e.g., riding a bicycle, performing surgery, carrying out a logical deduction). Relational knowledge, comprising experiential and contextual knowledge, sometimes just called experiential knowledge, knowledge-by-acquaintance, or know-of (e.g., knowing what kangaroo tastes like, what red looks like, and how local, cultural norms delimit what it is appropriate to say in a given context).
- Lilley, Simon; Lightfoot, Geoffrey; Amaral, Paulo (2004). Representing Organization: Knowledge, Management, and the Information Age. Oxford University Press. pp. 162–3. ISBN 978-0-19-877541-6.
In its more modern forms epistemology has taken the analysis of meaning and the status of claims to knowledge as its quarry. Consequently, writers such as Bertrand Arthur William Russell (also known as the third Earl Russell, 1872-1970), George Edward Moore (1873-1958), and Ludwig Joseph Johann Wittgenstein (1889-1951) have attempted to delineate three kinds of knowledge: 1. Knowledge that, or 'factual knowledge' ... 2. Knowledge how, or 'practical knowledge' ... 3. Knowledge of people, places, and things, or 'knowledge by acquaintance'
- ALT1: ... that the main sources of declarative knowledge are perception, introspection, memory, reasoning, and testimony? Source:
- Blaauw, Martijn (31 March 2020). Epistemology A-Z. Edinburgh University Press. p. 49. ISBN 978-0-7486-8082-5.
Also referred to as 'theory of knowledge', epistemology is the branch of philosophy that deals with issues surrounding (1) the nature of knowledge, (2) the sources of knowledge, and (3) the extent of knowledge ... (2) primarily deals with the question of what the sources of propositional knowledge are. Some sources of knowledge are widely accepted (perception, reasoning, testimony, and memory, for instance)
- Steup, Matthias; Neta, Ram (2020). "Epistemology". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 5. Sources of Knowledge and Justification: Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: location (link)
- Blaauw, Martijn (31 March 2020). Epistemology A-Z. Edinburgh University Press. p. 49. ISBN 978-0-7486-8082-5.
- Reviewed: (third DYK submission)
- Bishop, M. J.; Boling, Elizabeth; Elen, Jan; Svihla, Vanessa (21 September 2020). Handbook of Research in Educational Communications and Technology: Learning Design. Springer Nature. p. 74. ISBN 978-3-030-36119-8.
5x expanded by Phlsph7 (talk). Self-nominated at 08:07, 18 April 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Declarative knowledge; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
|---|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
|---|
|
| QPQ: None required. |
Overall: 
Approve ALT1, which is probably easier for the layperson. BorgQueen (talk) 20:38, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
- I see a mirror has picked up the article 88.4%. Lightburst (talk) 04:16, 6 May 2023 (UTC)