Jump to content

Talk:Deckmyn v Vandersteen

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

How did the Belgian court decide after the ECJ? Inadmissible because of discrimination? 2A01:C23:BCAE:DE01:2996:1BB2:DD12:870 (talk) 10:53, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

outdated. The decision came in September 2014: http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=157281&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=6655 -- 94.222.29.97 (talk) 18:40, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is unclear which are the "four suggested characteristics of parody". Later, two chartacteristics are mentioned, but it is impossible to understand what's their relation to the supposed four. --Ehitaja (talk) 10:27, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]