Talk:Decibel (magazine)

Magazines Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Metal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of heavy metal music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalWikipedia:WikiProject MetalTemplate:WikiProject MetalHeavy Metal articles

Reference ideas for Decibel (magazine)

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

Objectivity?

This seems like it came right out of the magazine, really needs some work.--24.88.87.143 00:36, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Erasing whole page

I'm erasing the whole page. Revert it if necessary, but this article is nothing but an advertisement made up by frequent readers of the magazine. Wikipedia isn't a billboard, it's an informative website. Stop advertising. --CanesOL79 15:17, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

hall of fame?

What is the point of this hall of fame? There seems to be only one point: fattening up the entry for the magazine and leaning on the reputation of the artists mentioned. How about deleting? Drmies (talk) 02:22, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hall of Fame / flexi discs

So now that Decibel has updated their website to list the Hall of Fame and flexi discs entirely, placement of these lists on this article seems redundant and unnecessary. I agree with the above comment that it seems like someone was just trying to pad the article, and it also seems like listcruft to me. I propose that these two lists be removed and replaced with a brief description of what they are, and the two external links above be listed in the "External link" section. I know that WP:EL frowns upon linking to multiple sections within the same site (or at least it used to, after a quick glance I cannot find this verbatim), but I believe it's at least somewhat justified in this situation. Fezmar9 (talk) 23:52, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]