Talk:December 2000 nor'easter/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Courcelles (talk) 10:14, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

First, I'm sorry this was left for over two months without anyone getting to it. Now that this is open, I'm sure we can work together and get this review done without being overly difficult for either of us. I'll post some comments tonight, but I like to read an article twice, in two different sessions before posting a "full" review.

The images are all PD and tagged as such, but none of the three have {{WP:ALT|alt text]]. Yeah, that's usually an FA thing, but no reason not to take care of it now. No dab links, all links work fine. (Though my computer doesn't want to handle a diju file).

Got it. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 15:02, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Should the bolded title and the article's title match? Maybe not... I can see both views on this.

Heh, that was a relic from when I moved the article but didn't change the content itself... oops! –Juliancolton | ^Talk 15:02, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On the convert templates, is the metre or centimetre more suitable for the metric conversions? Later you switch to millimetres, even, which for 250 mm seems too small a unit.

Think it's better now. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 15:02, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Although heavy snow fall in the state, no major damage was reported in Connecticut." Something about that sentence seems a touch off; either snow fall needs to be one word, or or the verb needs to be in a different tense.

Ugh, typo. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 15:02, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"In Massachusetts and Rhode Island, high winds, gusting to as high as to 50 mph" Are there a few extra words in there?

Yeah, fixed. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 15:02, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'll give this another read through tomorrow so my eyes are fresh. Courcelles (talk) 10:31, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the review! I really appreciate it. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 15:02, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. I loveit when I have to nitpick at these, because the article is already in good shape.

So, passed. Courcelles (talk) 15:28, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! –Juliancolton | ^Talk 20:08, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]