Talk:December (Roman month)

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Time Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Time, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Time on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TimeWikipedia:WikiProject TimeTemplate:WikiProject TimeTime articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Missing Information

I did my best to model this page after the other Roman month pages (see September for a good example), but as I don't have access to the book that is most frequently cited, I wasn't able to include all of the relevant information, especially the days table that the other pages have. If anyone does have access to the book and wants to add it, I would like to encourage that. Song (talk) 22:15, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@Cynwolfe: Are you still able or willing to fix up the days table for December like you had done for all of the other months over a decade ago? I'm assuming you had forgotten to get around to doing that. – MrPersonHumanGuy (talk) 16:25, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the ping. Here's what happened. When I was working on the Roman calendar, I was just getting to December when I decided to leave WP. There was a lot more strife then on talk pages, and I was just done. I always missed WP, though, and I started actively again last year after not editing for about a decade. I've thought many times of returning to this article, but it's tedious work and I haven't managed to rekindle my interest. I've also had some doubts about the way I did the other months. I do have a copy of Scullard in my physical possession that I could reference. It isn't entirely off my radar, so perhaps this encouragement will cause me to set aside some time for it. Cynwolfe (talk) 13:51, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]