Talk:Decapitated (band)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   The article received a copy-edit by Fdssdf (talk · contribs)

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   The history of the band is short for a period of 10 years of activity. I found some links to help you with this issue, see [1], [2], [3], and others at decapitatedband.net/media--Cannibaloki 15:42, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   The article need to be expanded to reach the GA status. Good loki.--Cannibaloki 15:42, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for the sources that you found. I didn't know about them before and they are really useful. I expanded both history and style sections by adding all essential information that the sources provided. The history is now split into two subsections.--  LYKANTROP  ✉ 23:49, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Well done, all organized (from bizarre to decent). Passed.--Cannibaloki 16:18, 21 July 2009 (UTC)