Talk:Deaths of Christianne and Robert Shepherd

Greece Low‑importance

	Greece portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Deaths of Christianne and Robert Shepherd is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Death Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

POV

!. Important

This seems to be focused on blaming the tour group operator, with quotations selected to be hostile to them both before and subsequent to the deaths. All of it is in reported excessive tabloid-style detail , eg. "The next day, Fankhauser had a three-hour meeting with the children's parents." The article is not primarily about their deaths. Its about the way the tour operator responded to it. Essentially, its advocacy. POV is the usual tag, but I agree it isn't exact. I've restored it, and ,since I consider that this page in its current form is a violation of the rules against attack pages, I am considering listing it for speedy deletion as such, but in view of the likely opposition to the removal of tabloid-style articles, I might decide to go directly to afd. . You might want to see if some editing would help, such as removing the pathetic adjectives, the tone of advocacy, the detail of events, and especially the detailed account of each of the company's statements in favor of a summary. An article about 1/3 the length would seem to have some chance of being encyclopedic. DGG ( talk ) 04:51, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]