Jump to content

Talk:Deaths in February 2007

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Filippo Raciti

[edit]

My contribution about this death was deleted because not notable, my fault was not to add any reference. However I still think is a notable fact since is gonna cause -hopefully- a lot of consequences [1] [2] I understand that the event is near the borderline to be not noteworthy.. so take a look to reference and let me know. Marra 09:40, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I put it in again, with the references Marra gave. Raciti may not be notable enough to deserve an article about him in Wikipedia, but his death definitely is. --Goochelaar 09:53, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Some people "become" notable only when they die, as a result of how they died. (See Jennifer Strange who died on January 12, 2007.) If the cause of death is highly unusual, we often see the person listed as a notable death. Que-Can 02:45, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Masao Takemoto

[edit]

Why has Masao Takemoto been listed as dying on the 2nd Feb and the 4th Feb? which is the actual date of death? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jennifer45 (talk • contribs) 17:31, 6 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

He died 2 Feb; duplicate has been removed. WWGB 23:10, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
My mistake, I created the article about him and my Dutch source said he died in the weekend, so it had to be either 3 or 4 and I did not see his name in one of these days yet. As the source published it on monday I assumed he most likely died the 4th, which I should have checked, in fact his name was already mentioned in the article. SportsAddicted | discuss 00:47, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Anna Nicole Smith

[edit]

8 Feb Unknown cause at this moment. Reported on Eonline.com [3]

Who says she died of a sleeping pill overdose? Its not even been half a day. I don't think anyone knows exactly what she died of yet. --tess 22:51, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Remove Andrew McAuley?

[edit]

On the 9th someone added this "Andrew McAuley, 39, Australian ocean kayak adventurer, missing at sea." I think it should be removed for two reasons. One, he's not famous in any way or shape, and two, he has not been confirmed dead nor has the search for him been fully called off. So I am going to remove him, if anyone has a problem with this, just revert my edit.--Azslande 01:08, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Some people only become famous because of the way they died. I suspect Mr. McAuley may be (or become) one of these. Sometimes these people stay listed with the Deaths article, and sometimes their listings are deleted. Que-Can 01:22, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that nobody should ever turn up on this list until they're either confirmed dead, or legally declared dead. But whether Andrew McAuley is notable or not is a different issue. Some people become notable by undertaking record-breaking (or, as in this case, record-creating) feats that are inherently risky ventures that could end in their death - and this is looking like one such case. If he had got to NZ safe, becoming the first person to kayak across the Tasman, then of course he would have been notable. Is he any less notable if he died in the attempt? As far as I know he was the first person to ever even try. I think he's notable for that alone. JackofOz 01:30, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of Oliver Tomlinson

[edit]

I've removed Oliver Tomlinson from the list because he does not seem to be notable. His son LaDainian Tomlinson is notable but that does not transfer to the father; the link provided (this one) says nothing about him save his name and age. Sam Blacketer 23:43, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gregg Petrocelli

[edit]

Is this guy really notable? Bobo. 19:54, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alex Henshaw

[edit]

poor Alex has seemed to have died twice - listed as dying on 26/2/07 but linked article states died 23/2/07 -- user:Jennifer45 1/3/07

Sorry about the edit, but I found the "poor Alex" comment by Jennifer45 to be in extremely bad taste...really not Wikipedia-worthy. You're right: Jennifer45 is the one who should edit her/his comment. Que-Can 16:28, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
extremely bad? how?? even if it was meant sarcastically it wouldn't be particularly bad taste. as it stands presently, it's pretty much completely innocuous. tomasz. 16:38, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The comment "poor Alex has seemed to have died twice" is an attempt at a joke about someone who has just died. That, to most people, is considered bad taste, and not needed in Wikipedia. It's up to Jennifer45 to fix it. Que-Can 17:01, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
you perceive it as an attempt at a joke. that doesn't mean it is. it's not "up to anyone" to fix it. it's up to you to get over it tomasz. 18:40, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Why the hostility? Why should I "get over" my POV re the Jennifer45 comment? I have my opinion, you have yours.Que-Can 20:17, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
yes, but i'm not telling people what they should "fix" and not. tomasz. 21:31, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
it wasn't meant as a joke - just a comment - and not really in bad taste either - it's really up to the people who add death reports to check their facts - i'm only making a comment re the error

user:Jennifer45

Angeline Barrette

[edit]

If Ms Barrette is notable, surely there must be at least one mainstream reference to her passing. Yahoo Groups is a "closed" reference that must be joined to be read. It's not like I am attempting to remove the death entry, I am just asking for the citation to be in the public arena. "It enhances the credibility of Wikipedia if the reader can speedily verify the veracity of a given fact by use of an outside source with a simple click of the mouse". (Wikipedia:Citing sources) WWGB 02:10, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikilinks?

[edit]

Why do people use Wikilinks for persons without a link???→ R Young {yakłtalk} 11:59, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

generally to inform people that the person in question has no article and therefore to encourage them to write one, with the rationale that if they're important enough to have their passing noted on this page, they're generally also important enough to have an article. W guice 12:59, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

John Macleod of Macleod

[edit]

Can we please leave this entry on for a few days (or even weeks) as an article is being prepared,he is a notable person (just do a news search on the BBC website) it is simply the case of him not having a wikipedia article yet mwarby 19:36, 1st August 2007

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Deaths in February 2007. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:44, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 11 external links on Deaths in February 2007. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:02, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 25 external links on Deaths in February 2007. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:17, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Deaths in February 2007. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:24, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Deaths_in_February_2007&oldid=1207599059"