Talk:Deathlok

Comics: Marvel Mid‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Marvel Comics work group.

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Untitled

One of the external links points to the original Deathlok pitch written by Dwayne McDuffie. And yet he is not listed anywhere as a co-creator. How come? Am I missing something here? AEriksson 12:35, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

My bad... just noticed that it was a pitch for a relaunch of Deathlok and not the first appearance. AEriksson 12:36, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Admitting I haven't read AT in years, wasn't his name Luther? TREKphiler ^{hit me ♠} 00:48, 18 October 2005

In a battle with Silvermane, Deathlok's computer revealed to Michael Collins that his cyborg body was capable of lifting 85 tons. This is significantly stronger than the Luthor Manning cyborg. Scrapper 00:27, 10 June 2006 (UTC)Scrapper[reply]

Robocop

Is there a reason Robocop hasn't been discussed here? Deathlok was clearly an influence on the film. Would anyone care to tackle this, or should I? WikiTracker 23:13, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds like WP:NOR. --Tenebrae 17:42, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regardless, the similarity is obvious: Detroit, dystopian future, man killed in accident turned into cyborg. And as early as 2003 the Hollywood Reporter describes Deathlok as "'Robocop Meets The Manchurian Candidate,' Deathlok is the story of an ordinary man who is turned into a cyborg assassin, until the last vestiges of his humanity eventually triumph and send him on a mission to eliminate the scientists who experimented on him." Group29 (talk) 16:56, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Collins

I think Collins had a distinctive enough career he should get his own page.

Lots42 05:39, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Up to you. :) I just expanded the info on both Manning and Collins, so they might be viable as separate pages, if you want to give that a try. 204.153.84.10 (talk) 19:47, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deathlok androids

The section on Deathlok androids from Avengers: The Initiative #5 should probably be deleted, shouldn't it? Given that they were Death's HEAD androids and all... TheCorpulent1 03:00, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Collins

The first sentence is really unclear "Professor Michael Collins was the second Deathlok to be created in the modern era and also the second to be created for the traditional Marvel Universe". Are the qualifiers meant to seperate him from Luther Manning, created in the seventies and from the future? If so, who was the first Deathlok created in the modern era for the MU? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.145.240.59 (talk) 10:44, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Presumably John Kelly, although for some reason he was listed after Collins. I've moved him to make things clearer. Daibhid C 15:33, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:AstonishingTales25.jpg

The image Image:AstonishingTales25.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --23:28, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FUR added. --Tenebrae (talk) 03:32, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Manning

Was Manning actually sent on the kamikaze decoy run or, didn't the villains involved just -talk- about it? And if so, was he sent against the Avengers Tower as planned? That would be noteable because the Tower is supposed to be the pinnacle of high tech. Lots42 (talk) 12:48, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Deathlok. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041130092915/http://homepage.mac.com/dmcduffie/site/Deathlokpitch.html to http://homepage.mac.com/dmcduffie/site/Deathlokpitch.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:16, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Mike Peterson (comics)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Mike Peterson (comics). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 15#Mike Peterson (comics) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Kailash29792 (talk) 10:57, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]