This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
Text and/or other creative content from Tom Simpson was copied or moved into Death of Tom Simpson with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cycling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cycling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CyclingWikipedia:WikiProject CyclingTemplate:WikiProject Cyclingcycling articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
Overall a really good article. It is well-sourced throughout by reliable sources. It is well-written and interesting. I'm glad I took this for review; thanks for your work on it. I did some copyediting as I went along reading the article. Please go back and check if I made any mistakes or if you disagree with any of my changes. Below are a few of my concerns that I felt should be addressed before passing the article. Thanks again! ComputerJA (☎ • ✎) 18:58, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
needed to earn as much money as possible before retiring – I would say change needed to wanted.
Done
His plan was to either finish in the top three or wear the yellow jersey – Please link yellow jersey for readers unfamiliar with the Tour de France.
Done
He was not able to eat and rode on reserves – Reserves is linked to Dynamic reserve, which has to do with biology. Please link the word to a correct link or remove the link altogether.
Done
with his rivals now ahead – The word now is usually avoided in Wikipedia per WP:DATED. Consider revising.
Done
On the evening of stage 12 his personal manager – Do you have the exact date? You can still leave on the evening of [date inserted] on stage 12 …
Done
The date he died, 13 July 1967, is not found anywhere in the Death section nor anywhere in the paragraphs.
Done
I want to suggest linking Carpentras.
Done
saying, "That's it for you, Tom." – Can you add the exact source where this quote is found? Thanks.
Done
he was pronounced dead, with official time of death of 5:40 pm. – It can be simplified to he was pronounced dead at 5:40 p.m.
Done
For a while, nothing happened – Not encyclopedic. Consider deleting or rephrasing completely.
Done
There was no inquest in either Britain or France – Please link inquest.
Done
Simpson was buried in Harworth – Please link Harworth.
Done
The magazine Cycling – now Cycling Weekly – Link Cycling Weekly instead of Cycling b/c that is the actual name of the article linked.
Done
In nearby Bédoin, there is a plaque in the square – Please link Bédoin.
Done
BTW, just realized that all the refs named "Howard 2010" do not lead anywhere. Please make sure to fix it.
Done
Thanks, I did the two remaining ones to pass the article. Not sure if you missed them but I didn't think they were that big of a deal, so I took care of them myself. Thanks for the interesting article. Congratulations. ComputerJA (☎ • ✎) 04:26, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Cheers for reviewing this, I'm glad the subject interested you. I intended to fix the other concerns you raised but I didn't have time last night. I'll sort out the "That's it for you, Tom." ref. I'm planning on doing some more work to get it up to FA status, so your work is appreciated. Thanks for the barnstar! BaldBoris10:56, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
_pictogram.svg){kind=small}
Done