Jump to content

Talk:Death of Christy Schwundeck

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk01:29, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Mujinga (talk). Self-nominated at 11:51, 7 January 2022 (UTC).[reply]

  • New enough and long enough. QPQ present. Everything looks fine (AGF on the German sourcing, though it seems to say it). This is more a question for the hook promoter since it doesn't affect the actual fact: would rendering "9c" as "9 cents" improve accessibility for international readers? (I think so.) Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 21:43, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Tweaked ALT0 to T:DYK/P5

"In 2019, demonstrators commemorated the deaths of people as a result of the Hartz IV system"

[edit]

The above statement is currently in the article (as of the time it appears in Did You Know). What is it supposed to mean? As best I can tell, Hartz IV is a government support program. Or perhaps it would be better described as an alteration ("reform") of a government support program which reduced available benefits. My only guess is that the demonstrators believed that this "reform" led to the deaths of beneficiaries or potential beneficiaries by reducing benefits. Whether or not my guess is right, the statement is in need of clarification. As written, the statement is borderline gibberish in English; government programs rarely result in death. (I'm American and my German is awful, so the current citation doesn't do me any good.) I don't mean this as a rhetorical question - the lack of clarity is a problem with the article that should be addressed. CAVincent (talk) 07:02, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've rejigged the sentence so it's clearer hopefully. Your guess was right, by the way Mujinga (talk) 12:52, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Knife

[edit]

The article does not even mention that the later victim produced a knife and stabbed the other police officer... (which is explicitly mentioned in the Spiegel article!) 2003:E7:3F08:C500:8119:F749:4B00:8326 (talk) 23:42, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]