Talk:Death's Domain

This article was nominated for deletion on 12 June 2024. The result of the discussion was merge.

This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Novels

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles

Maps Low‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Maps, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Maps and Cartography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MapsWikipedia:WikiProject MapsTemplate:WikiProject MapsMaps articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article had an importance automatically assigned to it. Once it has been checked by a human, please remove `\|autoi=yes`.

Comments on the original article

There are no dark-purples or blues or greens or anything in death's domain, there are just different Shades of black. And different tints of White too, presumably. There is only Black and white. there are "colours" of black and white, but nothing else. no purple, no green, no gold, etc... -Grim- 04:46, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I do have to thank the author(s) of the present text. Phrases like "congruent dimensions" and "refined metaphor" are not only massively accurate, but above and beyond our usual coverage of fiction. --Kizor 00:23, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Recreated article

This article, originally on the place, and afterwards made a redirect, with content moved to another article, has been recreated as an article on the book/map. BPK (talk) 14:22, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]