Jump to content

Talk:Dear Wendy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Plot

[edit]

This plot description is absurdly POV. - User:ShadowyCaballero

I noticed that too. I'm moving it here for now. Maybe someone can go through it and salvage the useful parts. Serpent-A 21:40, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Any film by a proven director deserves to be seen and commented on in its own terms. this is not what has happened to 'Dear Wendy'. The film was written by Lars von Trier and exhibits many of his tics and obsessions - notably a tendency to be didactic and rather melodramatic, yet also with a strong structure. Vinterberg works against most of the negative traits here, favouring a loose naturalism within the highly stylised story and setting.
The acting is uniformly excellent, but the debate and almost all 'criticism' for the film is centered on the supposed moral of the story - a group of misfit and rather anodyne teenagers form a pacifist gun club, develop close almost fetishistic attachments to their weapons, and run into the inevitable conflict with reality.
NO SPOILERS. Reading reviews and press reports, almost all discussion (and dislike) surrounding the film has been of two types: a) a non-cinematic debate about gun control in the USA; and b) criticism of the film's artificial and 'inauthentic' setting. Both of these trains of thought are held in common with Lars von Trier's recent 'Dogville'.
The film is however, very thoughtfully made, with beauitiful imagery and a distinct awareness of its own artificial nature. There are unusual moments of beauty and life within the film, and if at times the temptation to view it as a somewhat 'failed' Hollywood drama intrude, nevertheless, as a film, it does not fall into many of the dull traps of those 'typical' genre films.
Much closer to van Sant's 'Elephant' than to (say) 'Bonnie and Clyde', and very much worth the time.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dear Wendy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:41, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dear Wendy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:44, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]