Talk:Dead Celebrities

Dead Celebrities has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Dead Celebrities is part of the South Park (season 13) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 19, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed
March 29, 2010	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

Animation: American / Television / Computer / South Park Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Animated television work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Computer animation work group.
	This article is supported by the South Park task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Michael Jackson Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Michael Jackson, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Michael Jackson on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Michael JacksonWikipedia:WikiProject Michael JacksonTemplate:WikiProject Michael JacksonMichael Jackson articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Low-importance).

United States: Animation / Television / Colorado Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Animation portal This article is supported by WikiProject Animation - American animation work group.
	Television portal This article is supported by American television task force.
	Colorado portal This article is supported by WikiProject Colorado, our collaboration to create, improve, and update Wikipedia articles about the U.S. State of Colorado. To comment about this article, select the Add topic tab above. For questions about, or to make suggestions for Colorado articles, go to our project's talk page. We invite you to join us!

Ricardo Montalban

He's right there, sitting in the first row.

Karine Ruby

I think gold metal winning snowboarder Karine Ruby who died in a fall from a mountain in May was among the the Celebrities. Thit story got a bit of news covrege when it happend. I need some conformation. DLA75 (talk) 07:19, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No it wasn't. It was Natasha Richardson.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.129.233.225 (talk) 11:55, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Little Miss Sunshine and Toddlers and Tiaras

Is the beauty pagaent really a reference to them? Or just a jab at children's beauty pagaents in general? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.63.200.11 (talk) 02:38, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is just a jab at them in general. I will make ammendments immediately.

I concur, it is just a swipe at beauty pagents. Not a reference to little miss sunshine.--Tacit tatum (talk) 15:44, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of celebs

A simple list of celebs is trivia/plot reiteration. Is there no review online yet for it other than IGN? Alastairward (talk) 22:23, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. A list of the dead celebrities on the plane would be good for the page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.156.116.136 (talk) 14:05, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think you would actually disagree with the OP ...it is indeed trivia when presented as a simple list, because the list has no content. It needs to be worked in with a "reception" section of sorts. - SoSaysChappy (talk) 03:25, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. The whole leitmotiv of the episode is centered around the celebrities. While in other cases a listing might not be awarded enough relevance to make it to the article, I believe that in this case a simple list, linking the celebs names to each respective Wikipedia article, just like what was posted, is completely pertinent. mentus (talk) 01:01, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If a part of the plot is notable enough to have it's own section, it will likely be included in a critical review. In which case, it would form part of the cultural references. Alastairward (talk) 09:32, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The list is clearly Trivia, and some of these alleged people on the list may come close to WP:NOR. I think it would be better to edit the list and move it to the plot, in order to simply mention some of the celebrities Ike sees, limiting it to ones who are either named or have dialogue. Something like "Ike has been seeing ghosts of recently deceased celebrities, such as Farrah Fawcett, David Carradine, Billy Mays, Ed McMahon and Walter Cronkite......The celebrities reveal they're trapped in Purgatory because Michael Jackson refuses to accept his death." And that's it. The rest don't have to be mentioned. Nightscream (talk) 18:29, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tow gate

Sorry, but I don't understand what a 'tow gate' is. the like to airport gates doesn't help. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.188.33.25 (talk) 21:16, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's a gate at an airport to which a large plane cannot taxi itself. A special vehicle has to tow the plane (after it has powered down after landing) to the gate because if the pilot steered there himself, the force from the engines would disrupt and pose a threat to whatever or whoever might be on the tarmac in the area. You're right about the disamb link not providing any information. It would also be difficult to re-word the plot summary to explain this, because in the show it was used metaphorically (to imply that the "passengers" would have to wait even longer before they can arrive in Hell; towing a plane to a gate can - depending on the circumstances - take a long time). Anyone have any ideas on how to handle this? - SoSaysChappy (talk) 00:41, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Former edits

in a previous edition of this article, i had read quotes from chipotle.....they were playful and amusing...something like "we appreciate south park's episode, but we can assure everyone that there is no evidence that chipotle causes anal leakage"......but now this note is gone.....is there a reason it was deleted? thanks 123.165.73.25 (talk) 13:00, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't found any such quote in the edit history for this article. I don't recall it ever being there. If you can find it in the history, maybe we can figure out why it was removed, if it was. — Hun ter Ka hn 18:09, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Dead Celebrities/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: JulieSpaulding (talk) 10:59, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There are a couple of issues I'd like to see fixed before I pass this article:

The third paragraph of the lead section uses the words 'some proponents'. I would classify this as a weasel word and would recommend that you avoid it.
- Changed that (and the later reference) to "critics". Is that better? — Hun ter Ka hn 15:54, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, no. Weasel word states that 'critics' is a weasel word :( It says to specify exactly which critics say that particular thing (i.e. 'Critics claim' would change to 'Jane Doe of the Iqaluit Herald commented...'. JulieSpaulding (talk) 16:00, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I just removed the part with the weasel word altogether. — Hun ter Ka hn 16:15, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The plot isn't referenced. Not sure if this is an issue.
- According to WP:TVMOS, it doesn't have to be. It says, "Plot summaries do not normally require citations; the television show itself is the source, as the accuracy of the plot description can be verified by watching the episode in question."
Great. I'll know for next time. JulieSpaulding (talk) 16:00, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The 'production' section is a little short. In other articles (such as Pee (South Park)) the production section is a lot longer.
- Yeah, unfortunately, I find sometimes there is lots of production info available for a television episode and sometimes there is very little. Conversely, this article had lots of info on the theme, whereas others have little of that. I combined the "Production" and "Theme" sections into one section, which GAN reviews have sometimes suggested in the past to fix this. Does that address it? — Hun ter Ka hn 15:54, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Great :) JulieSpaulding (talk) 16:00, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The link for TV-MA L leads to two different locations (first in the lead and secondly in the production section). I think these should be made consistent.
- My mistake. Fixed.
OK. JulieSpaulding (talk) 16:00, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The word 'said' appears nine times in the Reception section. It would add 'spice' to the article to vary these a little ('commented', etc.).
- Ok, done. — Hun ter Ka hn 15:54, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Much improved. JulieSpaulding (talk) 16:00, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'd love to pass this article as soon as these issues are fixed. Thanks, JulieSpaulding (talk) 11:19, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Passed by JulieSpaulding (talk) on 16:32, 19 January 2010 (UTC).[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dead Celebrities. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5u1hwoejZ?url=http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/10/08/wednesday-october-7-cable-ratings-mythbusters-south-park-real-world-road-rules-the-ruins-and-more/30018 to http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/10/08/wednesday-october-7-cable-ratings-mythbusters-south-park-real-world-road-rules-the-ruins-and-more/30018

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:50, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]