Talk:De Profundis Stone
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Notability
[edit]The following discussion is closed and will soon be archived.
While reviewing this article (as part of new page patrol process), I went looking for supporting detail. All I could really find was one mention on a UGC(?) website. Are there other thoughts on whether this would meet WP:GNG? Personally I'm not so sure. In the absence of WP:SIGCOV or independent sources, there are likely OR tones/risks here that I'm personally not 100% comfortable with. Thoughts? (Personally I think an appropriately licenced picture and/or picture of the claimed "information board" would go a long way...) Guliolopez (talk) 12:32, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
- Any thoughts on this? If not, I'll likely "convert" the PROD to an AfD in due course.... Guliolopez (talk) 01:05, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
- Not having received any feedback in the last 2 years or so, I am simply removing the NN flag and closing this thread. Still not seeing that notability is demonstrated - but not to the extent that promoting to AfD. Any remaining issues can be addressed in the normal course. Guliolopez (talk) 11:27, 25 July 2018 (UTC)